Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Innate: abilities, ideas, dispositions, which are not acquired in the course of a development, but are present in an organism from the outset. - In philosophy N. Chomsky and J. Locke are relevant authors on this topic._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Terrence W. Deacon on Innateness - Dictionary of Arguments
I 102 Innate/language competence/Deacon: it is undisputed that human brains are suitable for and specially equipped to learn a locally dominant language. DeaconVsChomsky: this does not have to be called innate "language competence". Competence/Deacon: is in turn a learnable skill. >N. Chomsky, >VsChomsky, >Language Acquisition, >Grammar, >Competence, >Brain/Deacon._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Dea I T. W. Deacon The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of language and the Brain New York 1998 Dea II Terrence W. Deacon Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter New York 2013 |
||
> Counter arguments against Deacon
> Counter arguments in relation to Innateness
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-27